Nigeria: Renewed Talk of Dialogue between Boko Haram and the Government

Nigerian authorities continue to battle the rebel group Boko Haram, and authorities recently uncovered a bomb plot in Kano. But both purported leaders of Boko Haram and powerful figures within the political class are now floating the idea of dialogue once again. On Sunday, a man called in to AIT, a Nigerian television station, demanding that President Goodluck Jonathan meet one on one with a member of Boko Haram, and threatened further attacks if the meeting did not happen. Yesterday, Senate President David Mark seemed to urge dialogue with Boko Haram. The Waziri of Katsina (Counselor to the Emir) also recommended dialogue in a statement this week; the Emir of Katsina is a major figure among the Northern Muslim aristocracy and this call is significant.

Is dialogue feasible? The obstacles are daunting. Nearly two months ago, talks between Boko Haram and the Federal Government collapsed when the mediator withdrew, accusing the Federal Government of leaking information. The same problem, and others, may haunt any renewed effort at negotiations. Who will mediate? What form will the talks take? How will the two sides establish the trust necessary to move forward? Who can credibly speak for Boko Haram? I think analysts are sometimes too quick to assert that Boko Haram has fragmented, and to draw conclusions from that premise, but in any case how can the Federal Government have confidence that an agreement it reached with a spokesman would be followed by the entire group?

There is also the question of what the two sides would negotiate about. One issue where some agreement might be possible is that of imprisoned members of the group; Boko Haram has long demanded that state and federal authorities release its comrades from prisons, and Boko Haram has staged several jailbreaks. The government might be persuaded to release some prisoners in exchange for a cease-fire. Other issues, however, seem impossible to resolve from a logistical and political point of view. I do not see how the Federal Government would or could agree to strengthen shari’a law at the national level, or to take other major steps to Islamize the state; such moves would draw massive objections from non-Muslim communities and from outside forces. Perhaps there are other areas of compromise – a development program for the North, amnesties for Boko Haram fighters, payments to its leaders, prosecutions of politicians for corruption, etc. – but if Boko Haram demands that the Federal Government accept its core stated platform, namely the idea of strengthening shari’a, Islamizing the state, and eliminating Western influences from schools, government, and culture, I see an impasse.

So my view on the chances of dialogue succeeding in the short term is pessimistic. The hopeful sign in talk of dialogue, however, is that both sides may be getting tired of the fighting. Maybe that is wishful thinking; attacks have come fast and furious of late. But if voices from multiple constituencies – the Government, the political class, the Northern aristocracy, and Boko Haram itself – are floating the idea of dialogue even after a previous failure, then perhaps all of them, in different ways, are looking for a way out of endless violence.

About these ads

4 thoughts on “Nigeria: Renewed Talk of Dialogue between Boko Haram and the Government

  1. There have been a flurry of calls for negotiation between the Federal Government and Boko Haram. I think there are several groups hiding under the “Boko Haram” label. Some might be amenable to negotiation, others not so.

    I think the top guns in government know who these people and their backers are and what their backers want. I will say nothing else.

    *The AIT call was a prank.

  2. Have their been any statements by Muslim elites denouncing Boko Haram in any way. We know that they’ve targeted imams who criticized them but what about people higher up.

    • The local “Muslim elite” has been quite muted in its response to Boko Haram. This has been a sticking point between the Christian community and the Northern leadership.

      Why have they been relatively silent? Probably because some are complicit, some are simply afraid and most importantly, because they have lost most credibility.

      After the April 2011, elections the Northern elite was attacked. The usual refrain is that “they ruled Nigeria for 38 out of the past 51 years”, yet the North has the lowest human capital development indices in Nigeria. They have no reputation to stand on with the exception of possibly, Buhari*.

      *Muhammadu Buhari was a previous Head of State with a reputation for honesty. However, in the South he is regarded as a religious bigot.

  3. Pingback: A Purported Offer of Dialogue from Boko Haram, and the Reactions of Nigeria’s Political Class | Sahel Blog

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s