Nigeria: Changeover in Top Security Personnel

In words that have come back to haunt him, Nigerian President Goodluck Jonathan stated in March that the problem of Boko Haram, the rebel sect that regularly conducts attacks throughout much of Northern Nigeria, would be over by June. June is here, and now Jonathan is under more pressure than ever to deal with Boko Haram. Recent attacks on churches have incensed Christian groups, Muslim-Christian violence gripped Kaduna for several days last week, and just yesterday Boko Haram staged another of its signature prison breaks.*

On Friday, Jonathan replaced his National Security Adviser, General Andrew Owoye Azazi, with Colonel Sambo Dasuki, and fired Defense Minister Bello Haliru (also called Bello Muhammad in some reports). Speaking to reporters on Sunday, Jonathan offered a need for “new persons” and “new tactics” as the reason for the shuffle. In words that seemed to reference the cyclical reprisal killings in Kaduna, Jonathan also said that Boko Haram attacks churches to “instigate religious crisis” and destabilize the government. He also “pledged that Nigeria would halt the violence. He said the government was open to dialogue if Boko Haram figures identified themselves and made clear demands.” AFP (linked report above) comments that Sunday’s remarks “featured some of his clearest statements yet on the Boko Haram insurgency.”

Many people have wondered whether Boko Haram will undermine Jonathan politically to the point that his presidency enters a serious crisis (some Nigerians, of course, would already say that it has, for reasons not limited to insecurity). The answer depends on how one defines “crisis.” I do not expect Jonathan to resign or be impeached, but he is certainly feeling the heat. Additionally, even though Boko Haram’s range remains limited to the North (it has not, for example, attacked Lagos or Port Harcourt), in terms of attention from the press, civil society, and ordinary people, the issue is becoming even more “national” than it already has been.

This kind of shuffle with security personnel is not new – Police Inspector General Hafiz Ringim and six of his deputies got early retirement shortly after the mass bombings in Kano in January. But Friday’s firings were even more dramatic. The motivation seems primarily political to me. My reading is that Jonathan wants to buy the government enough time, politically, to find a solution; the President also seems to feel that the solution, when it comes, will likely involve dialogue. These personnel changes, however, will probably not blunt the criticism for long if the violence continues. What options will Jonathan have then, except to muddle through?

It is noteworthy but probably not decisive that the new National Security Adviser Sambo Dasuki (profile here) is from the royal family of Sokoto, and has complex ties to former heads of state Gens. Ibrahim Babangida and Olusegun Obasanjo. I say “noteworthy” because pondering what political considerations led to his appointment may tell us something about Jonathan’s relationships with different parts of the Northern elite. I say “not decisive” because I doubt Dasuki’s aristocratic pedigree will matter much to Boko Haram, or give militants serious pause as they plot further attacks. What will matter most is whether there will indeed be fresh thinking on both the security and the political fronts.

*One wild detail in the report on the prison break in Yobe State is the line that Boko Haram attacked the prison “through the Emir’s palace.” Presumably the Emir was unhurt; if so, this incident will add to the complex history of Boko Haram’s decisions to sometimes assassinate royals and sometimes spare their lives.

About these ads

9 thoughts on “Nigeria: Changeover in Top Security Personnel

  1. “These personnel changes, however, will probably not blunt the criticism for long if the violence continues. What options will Jonathan have then, except to muddle through?”

    No, Jonathan is transferring “ownership” of security to the North.

    If Boko Haram subsides, it gives credence to the popularly held view in the south that Boko Haram is merely an attempt by the Northern elite to destabilise the nation. Since a key member of the Northern aristocracy is now NSA, the south “will be watching to see if the Northern elite persists in rubbishing Jonathan’s administration”.

    I have said severally that Jonathan isn’t really the issue here. The issue is the rapid breakdown of trust and polarisation among the different ethnic groups. We tend to listen to the loudest voices, and the loudest voices in contemporary Nigeria are the voices of the North and the South-Western media. These voices, no matter how articulate, do not tell the full story of what exactly is going on in Nigeria.

    There are quite a few “silent” voices – the “Middle Belt”, the South East and the Niger Delta. All these groups have their unique interpretation of present events, but they tend to be ignored.

    • Definitely this looks like more “northernization” in the top security personnel. I will be curious to see who the new defense minister is.

  2. You are correct in your analysis. Jonathan had to make those changes particularly the powerful position of the National Security Adviser to satisfy both political and security interest. But like you said it more political. Sambo Dasuki (son of 18th Sultan of Sokoto Ibrahim Dasuki) is close to to General Babangida who still has an elite following him. Being a Sokoto Prince the appointment will also pacify Northern Emirs who are under pressure ‘to do something’ over perceived marginilization of Northerners in the Jonathan administration. There is also the need to reach out to the Nothern muslim leaders The Sultan being head of the Supreme Council for Islamic Affairs in Nigeria. Of course there on single high sounding name in the Jonathan administration.

    So in Sambo, Jonathan is like killing three birds with one stone. How it will impact on security, we wait.
    Thank.

    • Being a Sokoto Prince the appointment will also pacify Northern Emirs who are under pressure ‘to do something’ over perceived marginilization of Northerners in the Jonathan administration.

      Well said. Thanks for commenting.

  3. Alex, I’ve heard Jonathan say he has two big ideas in his plan to end Boko Haram, a security and a “community” solution. Jonathan seems to be admitting the failure of the security part of his plan. Do these firings make a more nuanced (negotiation) approach more likely? He’s now calling out Boko Haram to state their demands. The ball is now in Boko Haram’s court to present their demands. I can’t find any concrete negotiating points from BH. Do you know what BH’s demands are? Bryan Simpson

    • I am not sure Boko Haram is ready to negotiate or even if Boko Haram is the kind of group you could even negotiate with.

    • From what I understand their key demands are stronger implementation of shari’a (including across all of Nigeria), the release of all detained members of the group and, potentially, the creation of an Islamic state in Nigeria. The release of detained members seems to me like the only point on which negotiations might be possible.

  4. Pingback: On Tour in Northern Nigeria, Col. Dasuki Emphasizes Dialogue with Boko Haram | Sahel Blog

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s