Somalia: Evaluating Press Narratives of Reconstruction in Mogadishu

I do not know quite what to make of reports from Mogadishu, the capital of Somalia. There are at least two ways to read the news: 1) the situation is clearly improving or 2) positive steps toward security, peace, and prosperity exist alongside threats to the same, making for a mixed and unpredictable situation. Recent Western press narratives have tended to follow the first reading, with headlines and ledes that emphasize “progress” or “normalcy,” but these news stories contain serious contradictions, sometimes even within individual sentences.

VOA (statements that contradict the progress narrative are in bold):

The defeat of al-Qaida-linked Islamic militants in Somalia’s capital, Mogadishu, has triggered an influx of people escaping starvation in the countryside.  The city has grown from 1.8 million to 2 million residents in eight months, putting a strain on humanitarian agencies trying to help tens of thousands of people living in tent cities with no means of support.  Officials say security is much improved, although there are still sporadic clashes and the occasional suicide bomb attack.

AFP (statements that contradict the progress narrative are in bold):

Eight months after Al-Qaeda-allied insurgents abandoned much of the city following pressure from the African Union and government forces, the capital is showing signs of life, with reconstruction underway and land prices soaring.

Security is still not reliable, but people decided they wanted to return life to normal,” trader Ahmed Sheikh Gure said.

“People are rebuilding their destroyed buildings,” he added, waving at a newly repaired shop and a busy construction site.

Though Somalia’s war is far from over, a regional offensive did force Islamist Shebab insurgents from many strongholds and they abandoned the city in August.

The scars of war remain clear, with hundreds of thousands of displaced people living in and around Mogadishu, many in basic rag-and-plastic shelters, some in the crumbling ruins of roofless houses.

I am not in Mogadishu and I do not have a first-hand perspective on the situation there. But headlines that emphasize progress, reconstruction, and normalcy seem overly confident to me. Alongside gains in security there are lurking threats; alongside reconstruction there is humanitarian crisis; alongside normalcy there is political confusion. Symbols of progress can quickly become symbols of conflict.

I will be happy to eat my words on this: a thriving, prosperous Mogadishu would be a triumph for Somalia and for the world. But I will not celebrate a reconstruction until I see clear signs that a stable political framework is in place to safeguard that reconstruction. As Somalia prepares yet another draft constitution, I have not seen those signs yet (more here and here).


3 thoughts on “Somalia: Evaluating Press Narratives of Reconstruction in Mogadishu

  1. Just remember the following:

    1. Somalia is not Mogadishu  and Mogadishu is not Somalia.  How many times do we  have to repeat that crucial point? We all hope the centre gets  its acts together and save the nation or the peripheries will go their way.  Twenty years of being hostage to one city is enough.  THEREFORE;

    2. Give Mogadishu the benefit of the doubt for the coming three months.  The picture will be crystal clear to all by then. 

    Hope I solved somehow your Mogadishu dilemma.

    • Somalia isn’t Mogadishu, but if the TFG can’t make the capital city work it really doesn’t suggest that they can hold the nation.

  2. Having crossed from clear to hold to build, recent developments in Mogadishu are encouraging from 2010’s point of view. The city is likely to function like Baghdad or Kabul, mostly secure with unpreventable lapses. The election of a new government is critical to building momentum accross Somalia’s spectrum; failure to organize an acceptable vote will stunt local development and further disturb international donors. Al-Shabaab will target the election’s security and attempt to win its own seats, so the TFG has a big oppurtunuty to foil the militancy on a political stage. However the TFG and AU need to build up a larger presence around Mogadishu before they can complete a national campaign.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )


Connecting to %s