A UN Report on Somalia – And Somali Leaders’ Responses to It

The United Nations Monitoring Group on Somalia and Eritrea is due to release its 2012 report soon, but the report has already been widely leaked. It is available, for example, at the website Somalia Report. Journalists have already begun to analyze it, and Somali President Sheikh Sharif Sheikh Ahmed and Prime Minister Abdiweli Mohamed Ali have already responded to it. Leaks of such reports, one contact told me, have become relatively common. Members of monitoring groups and panels of experts are sometimes thought to leak reports out of a desire to forestall the possibility that members of the UN Security Council, or governments criticized in reports, will try to censor or block publication of damaging findings. Whatever the case may be, the political storm around the report has started.

The report’s findings are particularly sensitive (though some findings are not necessarily surprising) given that Somalia is currently in the midst of a transition set to culminate with presidential elections in August. This transition has already fallen behind schedule. Critics charge that the transition is hollow: it will produce a government similar in personnel and design to the current Transitional Federal Government (TFG), critics say, and will not solve core political questions regarding corruption, federalism, inclusiveness, and legitimacy.

The BBC highlights ten critical takeaways from the UN report. To my mind, three findings outrank the others in importance. First, the scale of corruption in the TFG, which apparently cannot account for upwards of 70% of its funds. Second, the abuse of diplomatic passports, including passports given to senior pirates. Third, the potential for the rebel movement al Shabab, which is steadily losing territory, to shift its center of gravity to the northeastern region of Puntland. All of the findings the BBC mentions, as well as the report itself, are worth reading.

Below are some excerpts from Sharif and Ali’s responses to the leaked report. In his response, the President attacked the Coordinator of the UN Monitoring Group, Matthew Bryden, whom he accused of being a supporter of Somaliland and of partitioning Somalia. Sharif further accused the Monitoring Group of disrupting efforts toward peace in Somalia. The Prime Minister, meanwhile, focused on rebutting accusations that mentioned him and his office, addressing his criticisms to the media as well as to the report itself. (I am indebted to a reader for passing on these links.)

The President:

President Sharif spent half of his one-hour speech to discuss the recently leaked report by the Somalia Eritrea Monitoring Group, and he launched a clear attack against Monitoring Group Coordinator Matt Bryden.

“Matt Bryden is not ashamed to support the division of Somalia into two countries. Matt Bryden has a track record of being against the restoration of peace in Somalia,” said President Sharif to the crowd’s applause.

Responding to Monitoring Group allegations of corruption, President Sharif said: “This government is ready for transparency. If any money is missing, I am ready to resign and to be taken to Guantanamo Bay,” President Sharif joked.

The TFG president expressed his disappointment that the Monitoring Group report was leaked at such a time when Somalia is ending the transitional period for the first time since 2000.

“This Monitoring Group report was timed to coincide with the end of transition period in order to discredit the TFG,” said President Sharif.

The Prime Minister:

The Office of the Prime Minister of Somalia (OPM) condemns allegations contained in news reports appearing in some of the media on a “leaked Monitoring Group’s report” linking The Office of the Prime Minister to alleged corruption and misconduct.

The Office of The Prime Minister maintains that the allegations are absolutely and demonstrably false. This deliberate misinformation is intended to tarnish the good name and integrity of the Prime Minister and also constitutes defamation and libel intended to maliciously harm the hard earned reputation of the Prime Minister.


H.E Abdiweli Ali Gaas reassures the Somali People and development partners of his personal commitment in ensuring transparent and accountable utilization of donor funds especially at this critical time in the history of Somalia.

Parsing these statements helps show what accusations sting Somali leaders the most (corruption, lack of transparency), but my guess (and it is only a guess) is that the denials and refutations will not substantially diminish the widespread sense of pessimism regarding Somalia’s political trajectory that the report seems bound to reinforce. Of course, some of the TFG’s most powerful backers appear to regard it as the most viable political framework for Somalia, whatever the Government’s flaws, and will continue to back its successor government on that basis, at least for a time. But the combination of the report’s damning conclusions and the missed deadlines in the current transition make the outlook for political stabilization in Somalia (despite recent military successes by the TFG and its allies) look quite grim.

6 thoughts on “A UN Report on Somalia – And Somali Leaders’ Responses to It

  1. I have to admit that, cynical as I was about government corruption in Somalia, this still took me by surprise. From this it’s clear that even the threat of Al-Shabab has done nothing to improve governance, even when Al-Shabab or their predecessors at the U.I.C. openly threatened them in Mogadishu. An interesting note is that it looks like the inclusion of former U.I.C. leaders has also done nothing to clean up governance which suggests that the problem is universal in Somalia.

  2. SPOT ON your view that, ‘ Critics charge that the transition is hollow:  it will produce a government similar in personnel and design to the current Transitional Federal Government (TFG), critics say, and will not solve core political questions regarding corruption, federalism, inclusiveness, and legitimacy.’

    The UN Report dealt with the corruption issue, regardless of the controversial nature of its author ( and he is, indeed, controversial with a capital C). 

    Let me share with you another core battle in the coming 4 years: the issue of Centralism Versus Federalism. This author succinctly captured it

    Click to access 20_centralized_somalia_jamal.pdf

  3. TFG officials would benefit themselves and Somalis alike by acknowledging corruption and pledging to reform, instead of denying. Politics 101 confronts a problem and moves on as quickly as possible.

    • They’d have to admit that they were the ones responsible and no one would ever take their pledges seriously. Even if 9/10 of the world suspects the truth, the TFG has more to gain (or at least much less to lose) by denying everything and reminding the international community that the TFG is the only alternative they have to Al-Shabab.

  4. The only people who perhaps feel a sense of pessimism after this year of consistent military and political gains in Somalia are Al-Shabaab supporters, Somaliland separatists and/or sympathizers, and folks that for whatever reason have something personal against the Somali people (of which there are evidently many). I assure you most of us actual Somalis do not.

    Corruption or not, Matt Bryden is a carpet-bagger of the worst sort. The one positive outcome about this whole affair is that the entire Somali community, both within Somalia and abroad, is now at least aware of this and of the existence of such pernicious elements within the Somali political sphere.

  5. My fellow country men and “carpet-baggers” of corrupted Somali president, Sherif ( speaker of the Somali Parliament, and current and former ministers are well all known and well documented for their corruption. Indeed, Somali was listed as the most corrupted nation in the world ( not by Matt Byden) but the world index of corruption. Corruption index 2011 from Transparency International listed Somalia and North Korea (i.e government in Mogagishu) as the most corrupted nations in the world.
    Are you going to say , the World bank is also “supporters of Somaliland separatists and/or sympathizers? Indeed, the world bank reached a similar conclusions. For Allah sake, stop supporting this harram corrupted leaders who are bleeding and looting money that supposed to feed your fellow hungry Somalis- most of whom are women and children. Unless, we Somalis go after this corrupted leaders, remove them from office, place them under arrest for theft, abuses of human rights and freeze their account in abroad, Somali will never be fixed. Please wake up and smell the coffee.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s