NPR, in March, wrote the headline, “Western Money, African Boots: A Formula For Africa’s Conflicts.” Somalia’s “success,” the piece suggested, could be replicated in places like Mali. Bloomberg, over the weekend, made the same argument: “To Stabilize Mali, Look to Somalia’s Lessons.” From the piece:
Mali is like Somalia in that, in both places, Muslim extremists took advantage of political turmoil to seize large areas of the country. In each case, African countries agreed to send soldiers to neutralize the threat — a way around Western reluctance to commit troops to far-off places, and a local solution more likely to be acceptable to African populations. Yet the forces largely floundered when left to their own resources.
Other examples of this kind of thinking are legion.
I’ve criticized the Mali-Somalia analogy, as well as the idea of Somalia as a “success story,” here. I will add this: beyond whatever merits the analogy may have, the way in which people make it, their seeming lack of awareness or concern or curiosity about the limits of the analogy, bothers me. Does the presence of “Muslim extremists,” “political turmoil,” “African forces,” and “Western funds” establish a fundamental similarity between two places? Are the separatist movements of Mali essentially similar to those of Somalia? Are the histories of these two countries, particularly over the last twenty years, alike? Is the situation in Bamako now comparable to the situation in Mogadishu? The answer to all these questions, in my view, is no.
I do not see what is to be gained, from a policy perspective, by eliding the differences between Mali and Somalia. Yes, there are Western-funded African forces in both places. But each country seeks, and needs, political solutions that respond to its own particular histories and dynamics (Peter Tinti’s writing on Mali is relevant here). If Somalia’s “model” offers Mali anything, it is grounds for caution:
- The length of time it took to reconquer territory
- The fragility of political progress
- The persistence of problematic center-provincial relations (see here for a grim take on struggles over Somalia’s Jubaland)
- Problems with payment and funding
Mali is preparing for elections that will likely prove highly problematic. Mali faces a massive crisis of refugees and internally displaced persons. Mali confronts a lingering guerrilla conflict in the north. Mali is struggling to determine who will rule reconquered northern territories, and what place the separatist National Movement for the Liberation of the Azawad will have in northern Mali’s future (see Reuters on Kidal). Amid these challenges, more attention to the specificity of Mali’s problems would bring greater benefit than than more casually drawn analogies between Mali and Somalia.
The one analogy holding water is this: both Mali and So[ Mali] were Africa’s democratic heavyweights before. What went wrong? Are we sleep-walking back to that era again without analyzing its negatives?
Is it the concentration of all power and resources by the centre? Will devolution of power the panacea of our ills?
I would also add that one should not so quickly assume that African troops will be more palatable than those of the West. Ethiopia’s role in Somalia and Burkina Faso’s role in Mali should both attest to this.
Your opinion is to the point. The Somali experience really calls for caution on Mali.
Pingback: SOMALIA : Crisis is building while Leadership continues killing. | Gregory Robinson
Pingback: Regional Interconnections and Conflict in the Sahel | Sahel Blog